Skip to content

Everything You Need to Know About Salary and Technical Bonus with the Fehap Agreement

The national collective agreement 51 (CCN 51), known as Fehap, regulates the remuneration of thousands of employees in the non-profit private health, social, and medico-social sector. The gross salary is based on a specific formula (coefficient multiplied by the…

Professionnelle du secteur médico-social consultant des documents de salaire et une convention collective Fehap dans un bureau administratif moderne

The national collective agreement 51 (CCN 51), known as Fehap, regulates the remuneration of thousands of employees in the private non-profit health, social, and medico-social sectors. The gross salary is based on a precise formula (coefficient multiplied by the point value), and several bonuses are added to it. Among these, the technicality bonus for managers raises questions, particularly because its eligibility criteria and calculation base remain poorly understood by a large portion of the affected employees.

Value of the CCN 51 point in 2026 and calculation of gross salary

The salary mechanism of the Fehap agreement consists of one operation: gross salary = coefficient x point value x ETP. Each profession is assigned a reference coefficient, and the point value serves as a benchmark for the entire grid.

Avenant 2025-04 has set the value of the CCN 51 point at €4.568 since January 1, 2026. This revaluation leads to a mechanical increase in all base salaries, as well as in the base for bonuses indexed to the indicative salary, including the technicality bonus.

To better visualize the impact of this point value, here is a comparative table according to the employee’s coefficient:

Coefficient Gross monthly salary (full-time)
392 392 x €4.568
439 439 x €4.568
537 537 x €4.568
715 715 x €4.568

Employees placed on lower coefficients see their remuneration approach the minimum wage, which has led to an increase in the conventional minimums in 2026. This tightening creates a compression effect: the gap between low coefficients and managerial coefficients is narrowing, a tension that the technicality bonus only partially compensates.

To delve deeper into the mechanisms of salary and technicality bonus according to the Fehap agreement, the components of remuneration deserve to be examined job by job.

Hospital technician in a medico-social establishment corridor in front of a display board of the salary grids of the Fehap agreement

Technicality bonus for managers Fehap: base, rate, and levels

The technicality bonus for managers is reserved for managers classified in group A2 of the CCN 51. Therefore, it does not concern all managers, let alone non-managers. This restriction is the first source of confusion.

Calculation base

Article 08.01.1 of the agreement specifies that the technicality bonus is calculated solely on the indicative base salary, that is, the product of the coefficient by the point value. Supplements related to seniority, compensation for constraints, or the decentralized bonus are not included in the base.

In practice, when the point value increases, the base of the bonus also increases. The revaluation to €4.568 thus has a dual effect on the pay slip of A2 managers: an increase in the base salary and an increase in the technicality bonus.

The five levels of experience

The rate of the bonus varies according to the level of the manager, which is determined by professional experience in the job. The agreement provides for five levels, each associated with a growing percentage applied to the indicative salary.

  • Level 1 corresponds to entry into the A2 managerial function, with the lowest rate.
  • The intermediate levels (2 to 4) reflect a progression linked to years of practice in the job, and not just to seniority in the establishment.
  • Level 5 represents the maximum tier, accessible to managers with the longest recognized professional experience.

The distinction between seniority in the establishment and experience in the job is a frequent point of friction. Only professional experience in the job determines the level, which requires the employee to provide precise documentation upon hiring or when requesting reclassification.

Justification of experience: the administrative trap

The assignment of the correct level depends on the employee’s ability to prove their years of practice. Work certificates, pay slips, and attestations from previous employers are acceptable documents. A manager who does not provide these documents at the time of hiring risks being classified at a lower level, with a reduced technicality bonus for months or even years.

Two situations regularly pose problems:

  • Periods of practice abroad or in structures not covered by the CCN 51, whose consideration depends on the employer’s interpretation.
  • Mixed career paths between managerial and non-managerial functions, where only the years in a managerial position in the relevant job are counted.
  • Changes in job within the same establishment, which can reset the experience counter to zero if the function changes classification.

The financial stakes are significant. A difference of one level can represent several dozen euros in gross monthly salary, accumulated over the entire duration of the contract. Checking one’s classification upon signing the contract remains the most effective precaution.

Two human resources professionals discussing technicality bonuses and salaries provided by the Fehap collective agreement during a meeting

Salary compression CCN 51: when the conventional floor catches up with managers

The revaluation of the conventional minimum salaries in 2026 produced a little-discussed side effect. Employees with the lowest coefficients saw their remuneration increased to remain above the minimum wage, while managerial coefficients only benefited from the increase in the point value.

The result: the pay gap between a qualified employee and a starting A2 manager is narrowing. The technicality bonus, even at its maximum rate, does not always suffice to maintain a differential proportional to the difference in responsibilities.

This compression phenomenon is not unique to the CCN 51, but it takes on a particular dimension there. The conventional grid, based on fixed coefficients, does not have an automatic mechanism for revaluing the gaps between categories. As long as the point value progresses slower than the minimum wage, the base of the grid pushes upwards without the top following at the same pace.

For A2 managers at the beginning of their careers, the technicality bonus thus represents an even more strategic supplement. Its amount directly depends on the correct classification in level, which brings us back to the question of justifying experience mentioned earlier. A manager correctly classified at level 4 or 5 retains a tangible advantage; a poorly classified manager at level 1 suffers doubly from salary compression.

Everything You Need to Know About Salary and Technical Bonus with the Fehap Agreement